bank of america safe deposit boxes missing

I think the appeals court also made a few errors, but since it’s not an alarm case and I doubt it will ever be relied upon in an alarm case, I don’t want to bother taking the decision apart.

The trial judge made numerous errors that were commented upon and reversed by the intermediate appellate court in California. The depositor was given a single sheet form to sign that referenced the other document, but the other document was not given to the depositor nor was it even available, according to the decision. The court refused to enforce an exculpatory and limitation of liability clause because those provisions were written in a separate document which was not shown to the depositor.

It’s about a customer who lost millions in gold, diamonds and cash in a safe deposit box at a Bank of America branch office. The case printed below may be of interest to some of you and it’s worth a quick glance by most of you. You can read all of our articles on our website. Having trouble getting our emails? Change your spam controls and white list safe deposit box case where liability found for lossĬA safe deposit box case where liability found for loss ALARM - SECURITY INDUSTRY LEGAL EMAIL NEWSLETTER / THE ALARM EXCHANGE

Bank of america safe deposit boxes missing